|
Num Posts
Sort Order
|
5569
Administrator
| Posts: 1070
| Joined: 08/06
Posted: 10/22/07
05:15 PM
|
|
what do you guys think - what makes for a better system and why?
|
|
Posted: 10/25/07
05:36 PM
|
|
Hydro's. Nuff said.
"A whole new level of average"
|
5569
Administrator
| Posts: 1070
| Joined: 08/06
Posted: 10/26/07
11:31 AM
|
|
ok that's kind of surprising, coming from you. I wonder if you said that just for my entertainment value... let's find you a sweet lo lo on 'dros...I can see it now...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/07
03:59 PM
|
|
So you don't like Hydro's? Why not? They are far superior to Bags in every way! Somebody, prove me wrong...
"A whole new level of average"
|
5569
Administrator
| Posts: 1070
| Joined: 08/06
Posted: 10/29/07
05:37 PM
|
|
yeah, if you like excessive battery clutter and leaking fluid and whatnot...
|
STMIKE
Moderator
| Posts: 273
| Joined: 11/06
Posted: 02/15/08
12:37 PM
|
|
i had both.
both suck in their own way.
hydros
-leaks equal messy fluid everywhere
=batteries equal wasted space and added weight slowing you down
-you can install hydro cylinders any way you want and make it ride good with accumulators plumbed into the system.
bags
-take up a lot of room to package the bag and cylinder in an a-arm suspension arrangement
-prone to leaking because of the common hose and fitting designs used.
-if you dont install them right they will ride badly.
|